{"id":28927,"date":"2013-05-14T10:34:38","date_gmt":"2013-05-14T15:04:38","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/?p=28927"},"modified":"2013-05-14T10:34:38","modified_gmt":"2013-05-14T15:04:38","slug":"nintendo-lawsuit-shocker-video-game-giant-put-on-blast-news","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/?p=28927","title":{"rendered":"Nintendo LAWSUIT SHOCKER: Video Game Giant Put on Blast News"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/?p=28927\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-23307\" style=\"margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px;\" title=\"nintendo header\" src=\"http:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/10\/nintendo-header.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"232\" height=\"169\" \/><\/a>The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld Nintendo&#8217;s victory in a patent infringement case brought by Motiva, LLC against Nintendo at the International Trade Commission. The Court of Appeals agreed with the ITC that Motiva had failed to satisfy the agency&#8217;s domestic industry requirement. The ITC had also ruled that Nintendo did not infringe Motiva&#8217;s patents.<!--more--><\/p>\n<p>&#8220;We are very pleased with this result. The court confirmed that Motiva&#8217;s sole activity, litigation against Nintendo, did not satisfy the ITC&#8217;s domestic industry requirement,&#8221; said Richard Medway, Nintendo of America&#8217;s deputy general counsel. &#8220;Nintendo has a passionate tradition of developing innovative products while respecting the intellectual property rights of others. We vigorously defend patent lawsuits when we firmly believe that we have not infringed another party&#8217;s patent.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>For more information about Nintendo, visit\u00a0<a href=\"http:\/\/www.nintendo.com\/\" target=\"_new\">http:\/\/www.nintendo.com<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit upheld Nintendo&#8217;s victory in a patent infringement case brought by Motiva, LLC against Nintendo at the International Trade Commission. The Court of Appeals agreed with the ITC that Motiva had failed to satisfy the agency&#8217;s domestic industry requirement. The ITC had also ruled that Nintendo [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[532,6826,2590],"class_list":["post-28927","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-boxing-news","tag-news","tag-nintendo","tag-video-game"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28927","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=28927"}],"version-history":[{"count":-4,"href":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/28927\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=28927"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=28927"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/ringsidereport.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=28927"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}